|
RARE MAJOR
COLLECTION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS, "THE JEWEL OF
PHYSICS"
FEYNMAN, R.; TOMONAGA, S.; SCHWINGER, J.; BETHE, H. et al.
Milestones in
Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
An extensive collection of
TWENTY-FOUR major works from the ‘golden age’ of quantum electrodynamics,
including all the crucial papers by Feynman, Tomonaga and Schwinger
which gained them the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. A rare and
remarkable collection documenting the development of one of the most
important advancements in modern science.
Contained in:
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| (i) three complete volumes of
Physical Review (73,74 and 75), bound in contemporary cloth.
Very good copies (not ex-library) |
(ii)
six complete issues of Physical Review in original printed wrappers (two
rebacked) |
|
|
(iii)
four complete issues of Progress of Theoretical Physics in original
printed wrappers (all rebacked) |
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the quantum theory of the interactions
between electrically charged particles and the electromagnetic field
(between electrons, positrons and photons, for example). It has been
called “the jewel of physics” because of the extreme accuracy of its
predictions: for example, the value of the magnetic moment of the
electron calculated from QED agrees with the measured value to within a
few parts in 100,000,000,000.
QED was born in 1928, with Dirac’s paper “The quantum theory of the
emission and absorption of radiation”, which showed that electromagnetic
radiation, contained in an enclosure, is equivalent to an infinite
number of harmonic oscillators, and used the standard methods of quantum
mechanics to quantize these oscillators. Although a major advance, this
theory, and its development over the next decade by Heisenberg, Jordan,
Pauli and others, encountered numerous difficulties: it predicted an
infinite self-energy for the electron [1], and several
other such ‘divergences’.
The spur to further progress came from experiment. At the Shelter Island
conference in June 1947, Willis Lamb [7] reported that
the 22S1/2 level of hydrogen lies above the 22P 1/2 level by about 1000
MHz, a result in conflict with the Dirac-Heisenberg-Pauli theory. This
has been called ‘one of the most important atomic physics experiments
ever published’ (The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years, p. 93).
It was accepted by the participants that this result must be interpreted
in terms of radiative corrections to the leading order predictions of
QED. This was made concrete almost immediately by Hans Bethe, who
carried out a calculation [8] of the ‘Lamb shift’ on
the train home from the conference: although this was somewhat
rough-and-ready it gave a result in good agreement with experiment, and
was clearly on the right track. A second experimental result which
demonstrated the need for change was that of Polykarp Kusch of the
magnetic moment of the electron [9]. Julian Schwinger [10]
used a technique similar to Bethe’s to calculate this anomalous magnetic
moment, and again found results in excellent agreement with experiment.
The work of Bethe and Schwinger showed that the parameters of mass and
charge associated with the electron in the formalism of QED are not the
quantities measured under ordinary conditions: a process of
‘renormalization’ must be carried out in which the initial parameters
are eliminated in favor of those with immediate physical significance.
The problem was: how to carry out this renormalization in a way
consistent with the requirement that the theory is relativistically
invariant? The solution was provided independently by Richard Feynman,
Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga..
The methods of Feynman and Schwinger were reported at the Pocono
conference in March 1948. Schwinger’s method [15,
17, 18, 22] was
highly technical, while Feynman’s was diagrammatic, using his now-famous
‘Feynman diagrams’ [21]. Feynman’s method was highly
efficient, yielding results with a fraction of the effort required by
Schwinger’s techniques, but it was not clear to most people why it
worked (Feynman finally provided a rigorous justification two years
later [24]). A few weeks after the Pocono conference,
Robert Oppenheimer received a letter from Tomonaga in which he described
his own solution [3-6, 11-14], which
turned out to be very similar to Schwinger’s. Freeman Dyson [16]
showed that the Feynman approach is equivalent to that of Schwinger-Tomonaga.
He showed further [19] that only three quantities need
to be renormalized, the mass, charge and wave function. Once this
carried out every term in the perturbative expansion in powers of the
coupling constant is finite (nowadays this is expressed by saying that
QED is ‘renormalizable’). Ward [23] showed that the
so-called ‘ultraviolet divergences’ all disappear after renormalization.
With this work, the ‘golden age’ of QED came to an end. Kusch and Lamb
won the Nobel Prize in physics in 1955 for the experimental work which
laid the foundation of the modern theory of QED, and Feynman, Schwinger
and Tomonaga shared the Prize of 1965 for their theoretical work
on QED.
The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years, American Institute of
Physics, 1999; J. Schwinger, Selected papers on Quantum Electrodynamics,
Dover,1958; S. Schweber, QED and the Men Who Made IT, Princeton, 1994.
1.WEISSKOPF, V. S. On the
self-energy and the electromagnetic field of the electron, Physical
Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (1939), pp. 72-85
2. TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant
formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields, Progress in
Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (1946), pp. 27-42
3. KOBA, Z., TATI, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a
relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave
fields II, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 101-116
4. KOBA, Z., TATI, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a
relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave
fields III, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 198-208
5. ITO, D, KOBA, Z. & TOMONAGA, S. Correction due to the
reaction of “cohesive force field” for the elastic scattering of an
electron, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 216-217
6. KOBA, Z. & TOMONAGA, S. Application of the
“self-consistent” subtraction method to the elastic scattering of an
electron, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), p. 218
7. LAMB, W. E. & RETHERFORD, R. C. Fine structure of the
hydrogen atom by a microwave method, Physical Review, Vol. 72, No. 3
(1947), pp. 241-243
8. BETHE, H. A. The electromagnetic shift of energy
levels, Physical Review, Vol. 72, No. 4 (1947), pp. 339-341
9. FOLEY, H. M. & KUSCH, P. On the intrinsic moment of
the electron, Physical Review, Vol. 73 (1948), p. 412
10. SCHWINGER, J. On quantum electrodynamics and the
magnetic moment of the electron, Physical Review, Vol. 73 (1948), pp.
416-417
11. KANESAWA, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically
invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields V [i.e. IV],
Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 1-13
12. KANESAWA, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically
invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields V, Progress
in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 101-113
13. TATI, T. & TOMONAGA, S. A self-consistent
subtraction method in the quantum field theory I, Progress in
Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 391-406
14. TOMONAGA, S. & OPPENHEIMER, J. R. On infinite field
reactions in quantum field theory, Physical Review, Vol. 74 (1948), pp.
224-225
15. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics I. A
covariant formulation, Physical Review, Vol. 74 (1948), pp. 1439-1461
16. DYSON, F. J. The radiation theories of Tomonaga,
Schwinger and Feynman, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 486-502
17. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics II. Vacuum
polarization and self-energy, Physical Review Vol. 75 (1949), pp.
651-672
18. SCHWINGER, J. On radiative corrections to electron
scattering, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 898-899
19. DYSON, F. J. The S-matrix in quantum
electrodynamics, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 1736-1755
20. FEYNMAN, R. P. The theory of positrons, Physical
Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 749-759
21. FEYNMAN, R. P. Space-time approach to quantum
electrodynamics, Physical Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 769-789
22. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics III: the
electromagnetic properties of the electron – radiative corrections to
scattering, Physical Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 790-817
23. WARD, J. C. Identity in quantum electrodynamics,
Physical Review, Vol. 78, No. 2 (1950), p. 182
24. FEYNMAN, R. P. Mathematical formulation of the
quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction, Physical Review, Vol. 80,
No. 3 (1950), pp. 440-457.
Price for the collection: $16,000.
|