The Manhattan Rare Book Company

1050 Second Ave, Gallery 50E
New York, NY 10022

tel: 212.326.8907  fax: 212.355.4403
   email: info@manhattanrarebooks.com

Science/Technology/Medicine

Literature/Modern Firsts

Americana/History/Travel

Art/Illustrated/Children's

home | new acquisitions | receive a catalog


RARE MAJOR COLLECTION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS, "THE JEWEL OF PHYSICS"

FEYNMAN, R.; TOMONAGA, S.; SCHWINGER, J.; BETHE, H. et al.

Milestones in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)

An extensive collection of TWENTY-FOUR major works from the ‘golden age’ of quantum electrodynamics, including all the crucial papers by Feynman, Tomonaga and Schwinger which gained them the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. A rare and remarkable collection documenting the development of one of the most important advancements in modern science.

Contained in:

   
(i) three complete volumes of Physical Review (73,74 and 75), bound in contemporary cloth. Very good copies (not ex-library) (ii) six complete issues of Physical Review in original printed wrappers (two rebacked)     (iii) four complete issues of Progress of Theoretical Physics in original printed wrappers (all rebacked)


Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the quantum theory of the interactions between electrically charged particles and the electromagnetic field (between electrons, positrons and photons, for example). It has been called “the jewel of physics” because of the extreme accuracy of its predictions: for example, the value of the magnetic moment of the electron calculated from QED agrees with the measured value to within a few parts in 100,000,000,000.

QED was born in 1928, with Dirac’s paper “The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation”, which showed that electromagnetic radiation, contained in an enclosure, is equivalent to an infinite number of harmonic oscillators, and used the standard methods of quantum mechanics to quantize these oscillators. Although a major advance, this theory, and its development over the next decade by Heisenberg, Jordan, Pauli and others, encountered numerous difficulties: it predicted an infinite self-energy for the electron [1], and several other such ‘divergences’.

The spur to further progress came from experiment. At the Shelter Island conference in June 1947, Willis Lamb [7] reported that the 22S1/2 level of hydrogen lies above the 22P 1/2 level by about 1000 MHz, a result in conflict with the Dirac-Heisenberg-Pauli theory. This has been called ‘one of the most important atomic physics experiments ever published’ (The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years, p. 93). It was accepted by the participants that this result must be interpreted in terms of radiative corrections to the leading order predictions of QED. This was made concrete almost immediately by Hans Bethe, who carried out a calculation [8] of the ‘Lamb shift’ on the train home from the conference: although this was somewhat rough-and-ready it gave a result in good agreement with experiment, and was clearly on the right track. A second experimental result which demonstrated the need for change was that of Polykarp Kusch of the magnetic moment of the electron [9]. Julian Schwinger [10] used a technique similar to Bethe’s to calculate this anomalous magnetic moment, and again found results in excellent agreement with experiment.

The work of Bethe and Schwinger showed that the parameters of mass and charge associated with the electron in the formalism of QED are not the quantities measured under ordinary conditions: a process of ‘renormalization’ must be carried out in which the initial parameters are eliminated in favor of those with immediate physical significance. The problem was: how to carry out this renormalization in a way consistent with the requirement that the theory is relativistically invariant? The solution was provided independently by Richard Feynman, Schwinger and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga..

The methods of Feynman and Schwinger were reported at the Pocono conference in March 1948. Schwinger’s method [15, 17, 18, 22] was highly technical, while Feynman’s was diagrammatic, using his now-famous ‘Feynman diagrams’ [21]. Feynman’s method was highly efficient, yielding results with a fraction of the effort required by Schwinger’s techniques, but it was not clear to most people why it worked (Feynman finally provided a rigorous justification two years later [24]). A few weeks after the Pocono conference, Robert Oppenheimer received a letter from Tomonaga in which he described his own solution [3-6, 11-14], which turned out to be very similar to Schwinger’s. Freeman Dyson [16] showed that the Feynman approach is equivalent to that of Schwinger-Tomonaga. He showed further [19] that only three quantities need to be renormalized, the mass, charge and wave function. Once this carried out every term in the perturbative expansion in powers of the coupling constant is finite (nowadays this is expressed by saying that QED is ‘renormalizable’). Ward [23] showed that the so-called ‘ultraviolet divergences’ all disappear after renormalization.

With this work, the ‘golden age’ of QED came to an end. Kusch and Lamb won the Nobel Prize in physics in 1955 for the experimental work which laid the foundation of the modern theory of QED, and Feynman, Schwinger and Tomonaga  shared the Prize of 1965 for their theoretical work on QED.

The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years, American Institute of Physics, 1999; J. Schwinger, Selected papers on Quantum Electrodynamics, Dover,1958; S. Schweber, QED and the Men Who Made IT, Princeton, 1994.


1.WEISSKOPF, V. S. On the self-energy and the electromagnetic field of the electron, Physical Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (1939), pp. 72-85

2. TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (1946), pp. 27-42

3. KOBA, Z., TATI, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields II, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 101-116

4. KOBA, Z., TATI, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields III, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 198-208

5. ITO, D, KOBA, Z. & TOMONAGA, S. Correction due to the reaction of “cohesive force field” for the elastic scattering of an electron, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), pp. 216-217

6. KOBA, Z. & TOMONAGA, S. Application of the “self-consistent” subtraction method to the elastic scattering of an electron, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (1947), p. 218

7. LAMB, W. E. & RETHERFORD, R. C. Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method, Physical Review, Vol. 72, No. 3 (1947), pp. 241-243

8. BETHE, H. A. The electromagnetic shift of energy levels, Physical Review, Vol. 72, No. 4 (1947), pp. 339-341

9. FOLEY, H. M. & KUSCH, P. On the intrinsic moment of the electron, Physical Review, Vol. 73 (1948), p. 412

10. SCHWINGER, J. On quantum electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron, Physical Review, Vol. 73 (1948), pp. 416-417

11. KANESAWA, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields V [i.e. IV], Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 1-13

12. KANESAWA, S. & TOMONAGA, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields V, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 101-113

13. TATI, T. & TOMONAGA, S. A self-consistent subtraction method in the quantum field theory I, Progress in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3 (1948), pp. 391-406

14. TOMONAGA, S. & OPPENHEIMER, J. R. On infinite field reactions in quantum field theory, Physical Review, Vol. 74 (1948), pp. 224-225

15. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics I. A covariant formulation, Physical Review, Vol. 74 (1948), pp. 1439-1461

16. DYSON, F. J. The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger and Feynman, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 486-502

17. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics II. Vacuum polarization and self-energy, Physical Review Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 651-672

18. SCHWINGER, J. On radiative corrections to electron scattering, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 898-899

19. DYSON, F. J. The S-matrix in quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review, Vol. 75 (1949), pp. 1736-1755

20. FEYNMAN, R. P. The theory of positrons, Physical Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 749-759

21. FEYNMAN, R. P. Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 769-789

22. SCHWINGER, J. Quantum electrodynamics III: the electromagnetic properties of the electron – radiative corrections to scattering, Physical Review, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1949), pp. 790-817

23. WARD, J. C. Identity in quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review, Vol. 78, No. 2 (1950), p. 182

24. FEYNMAN, R. P. Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction, Physical Review, Vol. 80, No. 3 (1950), pp. 440-457.

Price for the collection: $16,000.

Science/Technology/Medicine

Literature/Modern Firsts

Americana/History/Travel

Art/Illustrated/Children's